Date: 26.5.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 662 #Rhetorical purpose of antithesis

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Rhetorical purpose of antithesis

Rhetorical purpose of antithesis

Oct/Wed/2017 | Uncategorized

Purpose Of Antithesis In Literature – …

Rhetorical purpose of antithesis

Write My Research Paper for Me -
Purpose Of Antithesis - …

Art Sales Custom Framing Business Plan. Hart Fraeme Gallery is a fine art gallery and full-service custom frame shop. The cornerstone of Hart Fraeme Gallery's business is high-quality custom framing. The company is unique in its field in that it offers same-day and 11-day custom framing, in contrast to the industry-standard 21-day lead time. Hart Fraeme Gallery is rhetorical purpose, founded on a dedication to offer the Triopolis metro area the construction essay test, most innovative, trend-setting designs and a finished product of impeccable quality at unmatched speeds. Hart Fraeme Gallery is an S-Corporation that is purpose of antithesis, owned and phd thesis operated by Hart Fraeme, who has several years of experience operating another art gallery and custom frame shop.

The knowledge, expertise, and contacts that Mr. Fraeme has accumulated during this time have led him to found Hart Fraeme Gallery. Presently, the company does not have a retail location, although plans are in place to acquire a location in the Uptown Mall by September of rhetorical purpose, 2005. This location is attractive due to the relative lack of on immigration in the, nearby frame shops, as well as the area demographics, which mirror those of rhetorical purpose of antithesis, Hart Fraeme Gallery's target customer. As mentioned above, Hart Fraeme Gallery's primary focus will be on custom framing, which is expected to generate roughly 75% of monthly income. Although the thesis statement begins i will, company will also offer artwork for sale, this is done mostly as a service to its customers, and will typically account for no more than 25% of monthly sales. Nevertheless, artwork is necessary as a tool to model and sell custom framing options, which are many. The business will offer a selection of rhetorical of antithesis, nearly 500 mouldings and more than a thousand unique matboards. In addition, Hart Fraeme Gallery will offer a large variety of decorative mat cuts, design styles, and display options. The demand for artwork and custom framing is strong: 42% of consumers report that they are likely to make an art or framing purchase in geodesy, the upcoming year. Additionally, industry analyses predict a 4-6% growth in custom framing sales for 2006.

Given this, Hart Fraeme Gallery is confident that it can enter and establish itself in the market successfully. Financial projections are positive, and the company expects to generate healthy sustainable income and gross margin over the next three years. Purpose? Hart Fraeme Gallery has four major goals. The first two are related to establishing a market presence at the outset, while the third and fourth are ongoing goals. Open a retail location in the Triopolis metropolitan area.

Specifically, the company plans to enter into a lease agreement with the thesis statement begins essay, Uptown Mall, to lease a retail space of 1,500 – 2,500 square feet, with a stockroom / workshop area of at least 750 square feet. Purpose? Establish consumer awareness of both product and in the us company through marketing. This can be accomplished by advertising weekly in rhetorical purpose of antithesis, local newspapers, including Pioneer Press and Star Tribune for four weeks prior to and two weeks following the grand opening, and then on alternate weeks thereafter for phd thesis three months, advertising more or less as results suggest. Additionally, the company will create a website detailing products and services, which will include an rhetorical purpose of antithesis online shopping cart for Web purchases. Construction Test? Lead the industry in completion time, with an 11-day time frame for project completion on most orders and same-day framing with selected materials. Rhetorical Purpose? To do this, it will be necessary to purchase the requisite framing equipment, and to keep it on-site, along with a selection of stock materials for same-day projects. It is also necessary to establish business relationships with leaders in a good thesis statement begins with in this i will, the materials industry such as Roma Moulding and Mouldique, and to rhetorical purpose maintain weekly ordering and delivery schedules with such vendors. Focus primarily on essays on immigration custom framing, emphasizing leading-edge and rhetorical high-end design. To do this, the company will monitor changing design and decor trends.

Particularly, staff must follow such trends; therefore, the company will subscribe to several trade magazines, such as Picture Framing Magazine , Decor , and Art Business News . With In This? Hart Fraeme Gallery is founded on a dedication to offer the Triopolis the most innovative, trend-setting designs and a finished product of rhetorical of antithesis, impeccable quality at unmatched speeds. To this end, the company takes pride in three things: Eye-catching, unique frame designs, stemming from a strong knowledge and continuing study of both current and traditional decorating styles and design trends. The highest quality craftsmanship and an ongoing commitment to excellence. Dedication to work and constant drive to exceed the industry-standard three-week time frame for product completion. Hart Fraeme Gallery has four key factors that are integral to success: Quality Craftsmanship - Because picture framing is aesthetic in nature, the finished product must be of impeccable quality.

Innovation and Creativity - Custom framing implies uniqueness, and the customer expects a one-of-a-kind product individually tailored to his preferences. Fast, Professional Service - In a business where the established lead time is three weeks, eleven days is a refreshing change of Dostoyevski, pace. Additionally, in today's society, same-day framing is in demand. Embracing Technology - The computer has become an essential time-saver for all businesses, including art and framing, and computerized equipment is fast becoming a necessity for the modern framer. We recommend using LivePlan as the purpose of antithesis, easiest way to create graphs for your own business plan. Your business plan can look as polished and professional as this sample plan. It's fast and phd thesis easy, with LivePlan. Business planning has never been easier.

With 500 complete sample plans, easy financials, and access anywhere, LivePlan turns your great idea into a great plan for of antithesis success. You can download this complete sample plan as a text document for a good begins in this i will FREE. Bplans is owned and operated by Palo Alto Software, Inc., as a free resource to purpose help entrepreneurs start and run better businesses. Geodesy Phd Thesis? 1996 - 2017 Palo Alto Software. Rhetorical Of Antithesis? All Rights Reserved | We're Hiring! Try the #1 business planning software risk-free for 60 days. No contract, no risk.

Built for a good statement begins with in this essay i will entrepreneurs like you. No contract, no risk. Built for entrepreneurs like you.

Essay Writer for All Kinds of Papers -
Rhetorical Figures in Sound: Antithesis

My Daughter’s Homework Is Killing Me. What happens when a father, alarmed by his 13-year-old daughter's nightly workload, tries to do her homework for a week. When Working From Home Doesn’t Work. These Brexiteers Would Like a Do Over. Memorization, not rationalization. That is the advice of my 13-year-old daughter, Esmee, as I struggle to make sense of a paragraph of notes for an upcoming Earth Science test on minerals. “Minerals have crystal systems which are defined by the # of axis and the length of the axis that intersect the crystal faces.” That’s how the notes start, and they only get murkier after that.

When I ask Esmee what this actually means, she gives me her homework credo. Esmee is in the eighth grade at the NYC Lab Middle School for Collaborative Studies, a selective public school in the Chelsea neighborhood of Manhattan. My wife and I have noticed since she started there in February of last year that she has a lot of homework. We moved from rhetorical, Pacific Palisades, California, where Esmee also had a great deal of homework at Paul Revere Charter Middle School in Brentwood. I have found, at both schools, that whenever I bring up the homework issue with teachers or administrators, their response is test, that they are required by the state to purpose of antithesis cover a certain amount of material. There are standardized tests, and everyone—students, teachers, schools—is being evaluated on a good begins with essay those tests. I’m not interested in the debates over teaching to the test or No Child Left Behind. What I am interested in is what my daughter is doing during those nightly hours between 8 o’clock and midnight, when she finally gets to bed. During the school week, she averages three to four hours of homework a night and rhetorical purpose of antithesis, six and a half hours of sleep. Some evenings, when we force her to go to bed, she will pretend to go to sleep and then get back up and continue to do homework for geodesy, another hour. The following mornings are awful, my daughter teary-eyed and rhetorical, exhausted but still trudging to school.

I wonder: What is the exact nature of the work that is turning her into a sleep-deprived teen zombie so many mornings? I decide to do my daughter’s homework for one typical week. By late afternoon, I am tired after filing a magazine article on deadline. I’m not looking forward to homework. When I arrive home, a few minutes ahead of Esmee, I consider delaying my week of homework, but then I realize that Esmee can never put off her week of thesis begins with essay, homework. So I am relieved when she tells me she doesn’t have much tonight. We have 11 algebra equations. (Esmee’s algebra class is purpose, doing a section on polynomials, a word I haven’t heard in decades.) We also have to read 79 pages of Angela’s Ashes and find “three important and powerful quotes from the section with 1–2 sentence analyses of essays on immigration us, its [ sic ] significance.” There is also the Earth Science test tomorrow on minerals.

I am surprised by the amount of reading. Reading and writing is what I do for a living, but in my middle age, I’ve slowed down. So a good day of reading for me, assuming I like the book and I’m not looking for rhetorical of antithesis, quotable passages, is between 50 and 100 pages. Seventy-nine pages while scanning for usable material—for a magazine essay or for essays, homework—seems like at least two hours of reading. But the purpose math is easier than I thought.

We are simplifying equations, which involves reducing (–18m 2 n) 2 ? (–(1/6)mn 2 ) to –54m 5 n 4 , which I get the hang of again after Esmee’s good instructions. I breeze through those 11 equations in about 40 minutes and statement begins with in this essay i will, even correct Esmee when she gets one wrong. (I think. I may be overconfident.) I then start reading Angela’s Ashes while Esmee studies for rhetorical of antithesis, Earth Science. We have only one copy of the book, so we decide it will be more efficient to stagger our work. I’ve never read Angela’s Ashes , and it’s easy to essay see the appeal.

Frank McCourt, whom I once saw give a beautiful tribute to Peter Matthiessen at a Paris Review Revel, is engaging and rhetorical purpose of antithesis, funny. But after 30 minutes I am only about 16 pages in, and Esmee has finished studying for Earth Science and needs the book. So we switch. On Immigration Us? It is now time for me to struggle with Earth Science. The textbook Esmee’s class is using is rhetorical purpose of antithesis, simply called Earth Science and observation, was written by Edward J. Tarbuck and Frederick K. Of Antithesis? Lutgens. “The term synergistic applies to the combined efforts of Tarbuck and Lutgens,” says the biographical note at the beginning. “Early in their careers, they shared frustrations with the limited availability of textbooks designed for essay value of the writing process, non-majors.” So they rolled up their sleeves and wrote their own textbook, which reads exactly like every other textbook. “If you look again at Table 1,” begins the section on rhetorical of antithesis silicates, “you can see that the two most abundant elements in statement with essay, Earth’s crust are silicon and oxygen.” I spend the next five minutes looking for Table 1, which is 12 pages earlier in rhetorical purpose of antithesis, the book. Then come carbonates, oxides, the sulfates and sulfides, halides, and—I am asleep after about 20 minutes. When I wake up, I go out to find Esmee in the living room, where she is buried in Angela’s Ashes. I struggle with Earth Science for another half hour, attempting to observation memorize rather than understand, before I give up and rhetorical of antithesis, decide I have to get my reading done. Since Esmee is Dostoyevski, using our copy of Angela’s Ashes , I figure I will just read another 63 pages of the novel Mr.

Penumbra’s 24-Hour Bookstore , which I started yesterday. I don’t make it. I’m asleep for rhetorical purpose, good after about 15 pages. Esmee stays up until a little after midnight to finish her reading. I don’t remember how much homework was assigned to thesis statement with in this essay me in eighth grade. I do know that I didn’t do very much of it and that what little I did, I did badly. My study habits were atrocious. After school I often went to friends’ houses, where I sometimes smoked marijuana, and then I returned home for rhetorical purpose, dinner; after lying to my parents about geodesy phd thesis, not having homework that night, I might have caught an hour or two of television. In Southern California in the late ’70s, it was totally plausible that an rhetorical, eighth grader would have no homework at all. If my daughter came home and said she had no homework, I would know she was lying. It is inconceivable that her teachers wouldn’t assign any.

What has changed? It seems that while there has been widespread panic about phd thesis, American students’ falling behind their peers in Singapore, Shanghai, Helsinki, and rhetorical purpose of antithesis, everywhere else in on immigration us, science and mathematics, the length of the school day is about the same. The school year hasn’t been extended. Student-teacher ratios don’t seem to have changed much. No, our children are going to purpose of antithesis catch up with those East Asian kids on their own damn time. Every parent I know in New York City comments on observation essays preschoolers how much homework their children have. Rhetorical Purpose Of Antithesis? These lamentations are a ritual whenever we are gathered around kitchen islands talking about our kids’ schools. Well, imagine if after putting in a full day at Dostoyevski, the office—and school is pretty much what our children do for a job—you had to of antithesis come home and do another four or so hours of office work. Monday through Friday.

Plus Esmee gets homework every weekend. If your job required that kind of Dostoyevski, work after work, how long would you last? My younger daughter, Lola, 11, is a little jealous that I am spending my evenings doing homework with her sister. I tell her she should be happy she doesn’t have so much homework that I find it worth investigating. She agrees with this, but still makes me feel so guilty about it that I let her watch Pretty Little Liars , her favorite show. The co-op board meets—and over my objections makes me secretary—before I can start on Esmee’s homework. Tonight we have 12 more algebra equations, 45 more pages of of antithesis, Angela’s Ashes , and a Humanities project for which we have to write one to two pages in phd thesis, the style of The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian , the young-adult novel by rhetorical of antithesis, Sherman Alexie.

There is also a Spanish test tomorrow on irregular verbs. The algebra is fast becoming my favorite part of this project. Phd Thesis? I may have picked an easy week, but something about combining like terms, inverting negative exponents, and then simplifying equations causes a tingle in a part of my brain that is usually dormant. Also, the work is finite: just 12 equations. The Spanish, however, presents a completely different challenge. Here, Esmee shows me that we have to memorize the conjugations of the future tense of rhetorical of antithesis, regular and irregular verbs, and she slides me a sheet with tener , tendre , tendras , tendra , tendremos , etc., multiplied by dozens of verbs. My daughter has done a commendable job memorizing the geodesy conjugations. But when I ask her what the verb tener means (“to have,” if I recall), she repeats, “Memorization, not rationalization.” She doesn’t know what the words mean.

I spend a few minutes looking over the material, attempting to memorize the list of verbs and purpose, conjugations. Then it takes me about half an hour to Dostoyevski memorize the rhetorical purpose of antithesis three most common conjugation patterns. I decide to skip the irregular verbs. Esmee already worked on her Spanish this afternoon, so she goes right to the Humanities project, which she has been looking forward to. Essay Test? She calls her project “The Ten Secrets to rhetorical purpose Being the Only Sane Person in Your Family.” No. Essay On The Of The Writing? 6: Don’t Listen to Anything Your Father Says. I decide that the rhetorical purpose diary I am keeping about geodesy, doing homework will be my Humanities project. Soon it’s 11 p.m., and I start bugging Esmee to go to bed. She takes a shower, then reads in bed for a few minutes before nodding off at about 11:40.

I sneak in and grab her copy of purpose of antithesis, Angela’s Ashes and catch up on my reading, getting all the way to page 120. Essay On The Of The Writing Process? The hardship of purpose, too much homework pales in observation, comparison with the McCourt family’s travails. Still, because we are sharing our copy of Angela’s Ashes , I end up going to bed an hour after Esmee. One evening when Esmee was in sixth grade, I walked into her room at 1:30 a.m. to find her red-eyed, exhausted, and starting on her third hour of math. This was partially her fault, as she had let a couple of days’ worth of rhetorical of antithesis, worksheets pile up, but it was also the thesis statement begins with in this nature of the work itself. One assignment had her calculating the area and perimeter of a series of shapes so complex that my wife, who trained as an purpose, architect in the Netherlands, spent half an hour on it before coming up with the right answers. Essay Test? The problem was not the rhetorical purpose complexity of the phd thesis work, it was the amount of calculating required. The measurements included numbers like 78 13/64, and all this multiplying and dividing was to be done without a calculator. Another exercise required Esmee to find the distance from Sacramento—we were living in California—to every other state capital in America, in miles and kilometers. This last one caused me to question the value of the homework.

What possible purpose could this serve?, I asked her teacher in rhetorical purpose, a meeting. She explained that this sort of construction test, cross-disciplinary learning—state capitals in rhetorical of antithesis, a math class—was now popular. She added that by now, Esmee should know all her state capitals. Geodesy Phd Thesis? She went on to say that in class, when the students had been asked to name the capital of Texas, Esmee answered Texas City. But this is a math class, I said. I don’t even know the state capitals. The teacher was unmoved, saying that she felt the of antithesis homework load was reasonable. If Esmee was struggling with the work, then perhaps she should be moved to a remedial class.

That night, in an e-mail chain started by Dostoyevski, the class parent to seek chaperones for a field trip, I removed the teacher’s name, changed the subject line, and then asked the purpose of antithesis other parents in essays, the class whether their children found the homework load onerous. After a few minutes, replies started coming in of antithesis, from parents along the lines of “Thank God, we thought we were the only ones,” “Our son has been up until 2 a.m. crying,” and so forth. Half the Dostoyevski class’s parents responded that they thought too much homework was an issue. Since then, I’ve been wary of Esmee’s workload, and I’ve often suspected that teachers don’t have any idea about the cumulative amount of of antithesis, homework the essays on immigration us kids are assigned when they are taking five academic classes. Rhetorical Of Antithesis? There is little to construction essay test no coordination among teachers in most schools when it comes to assignments and test dates. This morning, we attended Lola’s class “celebration” of the Revolutionary War. The class had prepared dioramas of the role women played in the Revolution, the Boston Massacre, the Battle of Yorktown, and other signal events of the period. In hand-drawn murals explaining the causes of the conflict, the of antithesis main theme was that excessive and unfair taxation had caused the Dostoyevski colonies to rebel. The British had run up massive debts in the French and purpose, Indian War and Dostoyevski, wanted the rhetorical colonists to repay them. The colonies also wanted, several children added, freedom.

When pressed as to what that meant, they seemed unsure, until one boy came up with “Freedom to do what they want!” I came home and took a nap. My older daughter’s homework load this evening is just seven algebra equations, studying for essay on the value of the, a Humanities test on industrialization, and more Earth Science. This algebra unit, on polynomials, seems to be a matter of remembering a few tricks. Rhetorical Of Antithesis? Though I struggle with converting from standard notation—for example, converting 0.00009621 to scientific notation is tricky (it’s 9.621 ? 10 ?5 , which makes no intuitive sense to me)—it is pleasing that at some point I arrive at an answer, right or wrong, and my work is thesis statement i will, done and the teacher will give me credit for doing my homework.

Earth Science is something else. I’ve been dreading returning to Tarbuck and rhetorical purpose, Lutgens since our first meeting. And tonight, the chapter starts in the familiar dispiriting monotone. “Rocks are any solid mass of mineral or mineral-like matter occurring naturally as part of our planet.” But I am pleasantly surprised when TL take a turn into the rock cycle, laying out the differences between igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic rock in terms that are easy to understand and construction test, visualize. The accompanying charts are helpful, and as I keep reading into the chapter on rhetorical purpose of antithesis igneous rocks, the differences between intrusive and a good thesis with essay, extrusive igneous rocks make clear sense. The upcoming test in Humanities will focus on John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, monopolies and trusts, laissez-faire capitalism, the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire, the foundation of rhetorical purpose, labor unions, the essay on the of the imposition of factory safety standards, and the populist response to purpose the grim conditions of the Dostoyevski working man during the Industrial Revolution.

My daughter has a study guide she is ready to purpose print out. But our printer has just broken. We end up borrowing our neighbor’s printer. The logistics of picking up the printer, bringing it over to our apartment, downloading the software, and then printing take about half an hour. The study guide covers a wide range of topics, from how Rockefeller gained control of the oil industry, to the rise of essays, monopolies and trusts, to the Sherman Antitrust Act, to the Triangle Shirtwaist fire. Rhetorical Purpose? Esmee and I have a pretty long talk about the causes of the tragedy—the locked doors that prevented the young girls from taking breaks, stealing merchandise, or escaping the flames; the phd thesis flammable waste material that had been allowed to accumulate—that leads to a discussion about trade unionism and then about capitalism in general. This is, I realize, a logical continuation of the conversation in purpose, my younger daughter’s class this morning, which started with unwieldy dioramas and implausible impersonations of Dostoyevski, King George. Freedom, in rhetorical purpose, the form of unfettered capitalism, also has its downside.

I tell her my view: laborers have to in the us organize into unions, because otherwise those who control the capital have all the power. “That’s why it’s called capitalism,” Esmee says, “not laborism.” She falls asleep reading Angela’s Ashes . My daughter has the rhetorical of antithesis misfortune of us, living through a period of peak homework. It turns out that there is no correlation between homework and achievement. According to a 2005 study by the Penn State professors Gerald K. LeTendre and David P. Rhetorical Purpose? Baker, some of the countries that score higher than the U.S. on testing in the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study—Japan and Denmark, for example—give less homework, while some of essays on immigration, those scoring lower, including Thailand and Greece, assign more. Why pile on the homework if it doesn’t make even a testable difference, and in fact may be harmful? “It’s a response to this whole globalized, competitive process,” says Richard Walker, a co-author of the book Reforming Homework . “You get parents demanding their children get more homework because their children are competing against the whole world.” The irony is that some countries where the school systems are held up as models for our schools have been going in the opposite direction of the U.S., giving less homework and implementing narrower curricula built to encourage deeper understanding rather than broader coverage. In the U.S., or at least in the schools my daughters have attended, there has been no sign of teachers’ letting up on homework.

According to purpose a University of Michigan study, the average time spent weekly on homework increased from two hours and 38 minutes in 1981 to a good thesis with in this essay three hours and 58 minutes in of antithesis, 2004. Data from a 2007 National Center for Education Statistics survey showed American students between grades nine and 12 doing an construction, average of 6.8 hours of rhetorical, homework a week—which sounds pretty reasonable compared with what my daughter is assigned—and 42 percent of students saying they have homework five or more days a week. Esmee has hours of test, homework every night. She would be jealous of her Finnish counterparts, who average only 30 minutes a night. Attitudes toward homework swing in purpose of antithesis, cycles of roughly 30 years, according to Harris Cooper, a professor of preschoolers, education at Duke University and the author of The Battle Over Homework . We went from piling on the homework because of fears of a science gap brought on by Sputnik in the late 1950s, to backing off in the Woodstock generation of the ’70s amid worries about of antithesis, overstressing kids, to the ’90s fears of thesis statement in this essay, falling behind East Asian students. The current backlash against homework has been under way so long—expressed in rhetorical purpose of antithesis, books like 2006’s The Case Against Homework , by construction essay, Sara Bennett and Nancy Kalish, and in the 2009 documentary film Race to Nowhere —that we may now be living through a backlash against the backlash, at least in elite schools. “We’re in a heavy-homework part of the cycle,” Cooper says. “The increasing competition for purpose, elite high schools and colleges has parents demanding more homework.” Back in California, when I raised the issue of too much homework on that e?mail chain, about half the parents were pleased that someone had brought this up, and many had already spoken to the math teacher about phd thesis, it.

Others were eager to purpose approach school officials. But at least one parent didn’t agree, and in the, forwarded the whole exchange to the teacher in question. As the rhetorical person who instigated the conversation, I was called in to the vice principal’s office and accused of cyberbullying. I suggested that parents’ meeting to discuss their children’s education was generally a positive thing; we merely chose to have our meeting in cyberspace instead of the school cafeteria. He disagreed, saying the teacher felt threatened. And he added that students weren’t allowed to essay cyberbully, so parents should be held to the same standard.

I explained that we never intended for the teacher to read those notes. This was a forum where we were airing our concerns. What was frustrating me was that the underlying issue of ridiculous amounts of busywork was getting buried beneath the supposed method we had used to discuss the issue. Even when I showed the of antithesis vice principal examples of the homework assignments, he didn’t see them as outside the usual in essays preschoolers, terms of rhetorical purpose, content or time commitment. I left believing I hadn’t solved the problem. Yet something did change. Over the next few months, the math teacher assigned a more manageable workload. My daughter now went to geodesy phd thesis bed before 10 o’clock most nights. Parent-teacher conferences at the Lab School are similar to what I imagine speed dating to be like. Rhetorical Purpose? Each conference is three minutes, and parents can attend an afternoon or evening session.

My wife and I choose the afternoon. The conferences are strictly first come, first served. At noon, my wife and I sit in chairs outside each classroom waiting our turn, sometimes for a good thesis statement begins with i will, as long as 45 minutes. A student is supposed to be timing each conference, but the students often wander off, and the teachers ignore the parents’ knocking after three minutes. In each conference, I urge the teachers to rhetorical give less homework. A problem often arises, I explain, in the total lack of coordination among classes. A Humanities assignment requiring the essays preschoolers kids to render in words, pictures, or both a scene from rhetorical purpose of antithesis, Angela’s Ashes , say, can take an hour or two, yet most teachers don’t seem to consider anything creative to be homework. The creative stuff, like drawing or writing a short story or preparing a scene from a play, is all extra, to be completed in addition to the hours of humanities, math, science, and Spanish. The teachers usually respond in one of two ways.

They nod sympathetically and agree that the kids do have a lot of work, as if they have nothing to do with the assigning of it. Or they say that time management is one of the skills that a successful high-school student will need, and if my daughter wants to perform in an elite high school, she had better learn that in middle school. Both answers amount to essentially the same argument: the vast amounts of construction, homework are somehow handed down from on rhetorical high, and mere teachers can do nothing to tamper with the ordained quantities. Because I happen to phd thesis be in the middle of my week of homework when this year’s parent-teacher conferences take place, I am uniquely equipped to rhetorical purpose of antithesis discuss the work Esmee is doing. And over the years, I have noticed that the amount of homework does let up, slightly, after the conferences—if enough parents complain. However, there is writing process, always a clique of parents who are happy with the amount of homework. In fact, they would prefer more . Purpose Of Antithesis? I tend not to get along with that type of parent.

At a meeting with Esmee’s Earth Science teacher, I find out that my daughter has in fact not been giving me all the work. There is a worksheet, for example, requiring a reinterpretation and annotation of the rock cycle that Esmee never handed over. The teacher finds an extra copy for me. So I have another date with Tarbuck and Lutgens. When I get home, Esmee tells me she got a C on her math homework from the night before because she hadn’t made an answer column. Her correct answers were there, at the end of each neatly written-out equation, yet they weren’t segregated into essays preschoolers, a separate column on the right side of each page. I’m amazed that the rhetorical pettiness of this doesn’t seem to bother her.

School is training her well for the inanities of adult life. Our math homework this evening is practicing multiplying a polynomial by a monomial, and geodesy phd thesis, we breeze through it in about half an purpose, hour. Then we have to essay i will translate some song lyrics from Spanish to English. Esmee’s Spanish teacher already told my wife and me in our conference this afternoon that she can tell when the kids use Google Translate—which is all the time. It’s a wonder: simply type in of antithesis, the lyrics, copy down the translation, and then, in an attempt to throw off the teacher, add a few mistakes. Essays Preschoolers? So Si te quedas a mi lado, si te subes en el tren , which Google renders as “If you stay by my side, if you get on the train,” becomes “If you stay by my side, if you go up on rhetorical purpose of antithesis the train.” And, at last, more Angela’s Ashes . The more immersed I become in Esmee’s homework, the on immigration more reassured I am that the rhetorical purpose of antithesis teachers, principals, and school-board members who are coming up with this curriculum are earnest about their work. They are making difficult decisions about what to teach or not teach in the limited class time they have. The overall education being imparted is secular, humanistic, multicultural, and intensely quantitative.

The math Esmee is doing at 13, for example, is beyond what I was doing at essays on immigration in the, that age. Of course, there are gaps—so far as I can tell, Esmee has spent her entire life studying American history, with several years on Native Americans, and absolutely nothing on, say, China, Japan, India, England post-1776, France after Lafayette, Germany, Russia, etc. Rhetorical Purpose? Like many parents, I wish there was more emphasis on creative work, on writing assignments that didn’t require Esmee to Dostoyevski use eight “transition words” and seven metaphors. This school has clearly made choices—these kids are going to get very good at algebra and maybe a little less good at creative writing. I can’t say I fault them in this, though I know what I would prefer to spend my days doing. If Esmee masters the purpose of antithesis material covered in her classes, she will emerge as a well-rounded, socially aware citizen, a serious reader with good reasoning capabilities and a decent knowledge of the universe she lives in. Essays Preschoolers? What more can I ask of purpose, her school? But are these many hours of essays us, homework the only way to achieve this metamorphosis of child into virtuous citizen? According to my daughter’s teachers, principals, and administrators, the answer is an emphatic yes. Rhetorical Of Antithesis? Certainly, they have told me, all the homework does no harm.

As I watch my daughter struggle through school days on too little sleep and feel almost guilty if she wants to watch an a good statement essay, hour of television instead of advancing a few yards in the trench warfare of her weekly homework routine, I have my doubts. When would she ever have time to, say, read a book for pleasure? Or write a story or paint a picture or play the guitar? I can’t imagine there will be a magical reduction in homework assignments anytime soon. Rhetorical? But what I will continue to do at every opportunity is remind teachers that if each is assigning an hour of homework a night, and the average kid is taking four or five academic classes, then that is simply an unrealistic cumulative workload. Give the geodesy kids a break. Once in a while. I don’t expect teachers to rhetorical purpose drastically curtail their assignments, just to occasionally lighten the load.

Of course, I may just be balancing the scales against those parents asking for essay value of the process, extra assignments for their child. Has this worked? Well, it did in Brentwood, even if it took parental pressure. And though I can’t draw a causal line between my day of speed dating—I mean, going to parent-teacher conferences—at the Lab School and a reduction in homework assignments, it did seem to me that in the months afterward, Esmee was able to get more sleep. At least a couple of minutes’ worth. Esmee just started high school.

She has told me she feels that the many hours of homework in rhetorical of antithesis, middle school have prepared her well. Construction Essay Test? “There is rhetorical purpose of antithesis, no way they can give me more homework,” she reasons. I have my doubts. As for Lola: When it came time to select a middle school, she took the geodesy admissions test for Lab and of antithesis, listed it as her first choice, despite my telling her that in my view, the phd thesis school is too rigidly focused on academics and assigns too much homework. Lola, always competitive with her older sister, replies that she is good at homework. She’s going to need to be. She was accepted at Lab. Lola is sleeping over at a friend’s house. Esmee hasn’t started her weekend homework yet. Instead, she’s watching episodes of Portlandia on her computer.

The weekend homework includes another 15 algebra equations, studying for rhetorical purpose, a Spanish test on Monday, and, of course, more Angela’s Ashes . Phd Thesis? She also has an algebra midterm on purpose Tuesday. I tell Esmee that this seems strange—didn’t she just have an algebra midterm? She says that in her class, they have more than one midterm every term. My wife and I decide to a good go out to dinner, and on our way up Hudson Street, we run into purpose of antithesis, another couple we are close friends with. This couple’s oldest daughter also goes to Lab.

She’s at home doing homework. We stand on phd thesis the sidewalk for a few minutes, chatting. The husband is rhetorical purpose, smoking a joint, and he hands it over. I haven’t smoked in phd thesis, a few months, but it’s Friday night and rhetorical of antithesis, I’ve been doing homework all week. I take a few tokes. We part ways, and my wife and construction essay test, I go to a Japanese restaurant, where, as soon as I am seated, I regret smoking. It’s going to be hell trying to rhetorical do algebra tonight with the head I have on right now. Nonetheless, when I’m home, I sit at us, the dining table and attempt to work my way through the polynomial worksheet. Purpose? I am immediately lost in all the 2x(–3y5+ 3x2)6s. Dostoyevski? The numbers that were so familiar and reassuring just yesterday have become repellent. I realize, sitting there, failing to solve my algebra homework, that I have inadvertently yet perfectly re-created my own eighth-grade homework conditions: getting stoned, attempting math, and failing at rhetorical purpose of antithesis, it.

I consider my daughter, who to my knowledge has never smoked marijuana. That’s a good thing, I think in my hazy state. I wouldn’t wish this condition—attempting algebra when high—on anyone. One of the reasons I believe my daughter hasn’t yet tried marijuana is because she simply doesn’t have the time. I decide to give up on algebra for the night. It’s only Friday, and I have until Monday to finish my homework.

Mass Shootings in the United States: 'This Is Who We Are' In the wake of Las Vegas, only one thing is certain, according to James Fallows: it will happen again. Tim Piazza fought for his life for 12 hours before his Beta Theta Pi brothers called 911. By then, it was too late. At about 3 p.m. on geodesy phd thesis Friday, February 3, Tim Piazza, a sophomore at Penn State University, arrived at Hershey Medical Center by helicopter.

Eighteen hours earlier, he had been in the kind of raging good health that only teenagers enjoy. He was a handsome, redheaded kid with a shy smile, a hometown girlfriend, and a family who loved him very much. Now he had a lacerated spleen, an abdomen full of blood, and multiple traumatic brain injuries. Rhetorical Of Antithesis? He had fallen down a flight of stairs during a hazing event at his fraternity, Beta Theta Pi, but the members had waited nearly 12 hours before calling 911, relenting only when their pledge “looked fucking dead.” Tim underwent surgery shortly after arriving at Dostoyevski, Hershey, but it was too late. He died early the next morning.

When Working From Home Doesn’t Work. IBM pioneered telecommuting. Now it wants people back in the office. I n 1979, IBM was putting its stamp on the American landscape. For 20 years, it had been hiring the greats of purpose, modernism to statement in this essay erect buildings where scientists and salespeople could work shoulder-to-shoulder commanding the burgeoning computer industry. But that year, one of its new facilities—the Santa Teresa Laboratory, in Silicon Valley—tried an experiment. To ease a logjam at purpose, the office mainframe, it installed boxy, green-screened terminals in Dostoyevski, the homes of five employees, allowing them to work from home. The idea of telecommuting was still a novelty. But this little solution seemed effective. By 1983, about 2,000 IBMers were working remotely.

The corporation eventually realized that it could save millions by selling its signature buildings and institutionalizing distance work; the purpose of antithesis number of remote workers ballooned. In 2009, an IBM report boasted that “40 percent of IBM’s some 386,000 employees in 173 countries have no office at all.” More than 58 million square feet of office space had been unloaded, at geodesy, a gain of nearly $2 billion. Of Antithesis? IBM, moreover, wanted to help other corporations reap the same officeless efficiencies through its consulting services. Leading by example was good marketing. A small group of a good thesis statement begins in this essay i will, programmers wants to change how we code—before catastrophe strikes. T here were six hours during the rhetorical purpose of antithesis night of essays preschoolers, April 10, 2014, when the rhetorical of antithesis entire population of Washington State had no 911 service. A Good Thesis Begins With In This Essay? People who called for help got a busy signal. One Seattle woman dialed 911 at least 37 times while a stranger was trying to of antithesis break into her house.

When he finally crawled into her living room through a window, she picked up a kitchen knife. The man fled. The 911 outage, at the time the observation essays preschoolers largest ever reported, was traced to rhetorical purpose software running on a server in Dostoyevski, Englewood, Colorado. Purpose? Operated by a systems provider named Intrado, the server kept a running counter of geodesy, how many calls it had routed to 911 dispatchers around the country. Intrado programmers had set a threshold for how high the counter could go. They picked a number in the millions. The president’s call for a Senate investigation into news outlets for publishing unflattering stories about him is an attack on rhetorical freedom of the press. Frustrated with a set of damning reports about his relationship with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson—including the nugget that Tillerson called him a “moron” (perhaps with an R-rated modifier)—the president offered a new suggestion on construction essay Twitter Thursday morning: Why not explore government censorship of the press? Why Isn't the rhetorical Senate Intel Committee looking into the Fake News Networks in OUR country to see why so much of our news is just made up-FAKE!

Trump had been relatively quiet on Twitter for a few days, following the massacre in geodesy phd thesis, Las Vegas and rhetorical, his trip to hurricane-ravaged Puerto Rico, but the Tillerson stories on Wednesday set off a new tirade of tweets against observation essays preschoolers the press. Most of them are the standard “Fake news!” variety—never mind that there have been stories of Trump-Tillerson tension for months, and that multiple outlets have confirmed the purpose “moron” anecdote—but the president is calling for something different here. Begins Essay I Will? He is suggesting that the rhetorical Senate bring its investigative powers to bear on news reports that are, from all indications save Tillerson’s non-denial denial, entirely accurate. These Brexiteers Would Like a Do Over. Life among the Bregretters. On June 26th of last year, 54-year old Sandra Pengelley walked into her local polling office in the Tory constituency of Mid Bedfordshire to cast her vote on the Brexit referendum. On Immigration In The? Partly on the basis of how a well-known radio host described the European Union, Pengelly decided she’d had enough of its “dictatorship,” and voted Leave. “But then I started to purpose of antithesis have a sinking feeling,” she said. When, exactly? “When the results came out.

The next day.” Two weeks later, Nigel Farage (the radio show host in essay on the process, question) resigned from his position as the head of the UK Independence Party, the purpose pro-Brexit pop-up party; the full weight of her mistake hit her. “It turned my stomach,” she said. “You have simply walked away from politics and Dostoyevski, left everyone else to pick up your dirty work.” Photographing the Microscopic: Winners of Nikon Small World 2017. Nikon just announced the winners of the 2017 Small World Photomicrography Competition, and purpose, they’ve shared some of the essays preschoolers winning and purpose, honored images with us here. Nikon just announced the winners of the 2017 Small World Photomicrography Competition, and they’ve shared some of the winning and honored images with us here. The contest invites photographers and scientists to construction essay test submit images of all things visible under a microscope. Purpose Of Antithesis? More than 2,000 entries were received from 88 countries in preschoolers, 2017, the 43rd year of the purpose competition. Writing Advice From a (Newly Minted) Nobel Winner. Kazuo Ishiguro wrote the bulk of thesis statement begins with i will, The Remains of the Day in rhetorical of antithesis, four weeks. All it took was extreme dedication—and a willingness to be terrible. It’s tempting to in the us talk of writing—the art of it, the craft of it, the lifestyle of it—as a kind of romance. Writers of of antithesis, serious literature (according to, at least, many writers of serious literature) do not simply type stark words onto blank pages; instead, they stare into an abyss and reach into observation, their souls and find, if they are fortunate, the swirling fires of Prometheus. “We write to taste life twice, in the moment and in rhetorical, retrospect,” Anais Nin said, which is preschoolers, beautiful and true and also objectively incorrect: Writing is delicious work, but it is for rhetorical purpose of antithesis, the most part simply work.

It’s often lonely. Observation Essays? It’s rarely romantic. (I am not a writer of serious literature, but I am a writer, and I am writing this while sipping stale coffee from a mug that’s in bad need of a wash.) Writing is a craft in the way that carpentry is a craft: There’s art to it, sure, and a certain inspiration required of it, definitely, but for the most part you’re just sawing and sanding and getting dust in purpose of antithesis, your eyes. The rules for discussing firearms in Dostoyevski, the United States obscure the obvious solutions. A village has been built in the deepest gully of a floodplain. At regular intervals, flash floods wipe away houses, killing all inside. Less dramatic—but more lethal—is the steady toll as individual villagers slip and rhetorical of antithesis, drown in geodesy, the marshes around them. After especially deadly events, the villagers solemnly discuss what they might do to protect themselves.

Perhaps they might raise their homes on stilts? But a powerful faction among the rhetorical of antithesis villagers is always at hand to explain why these ideas won’t work. “No law can keep our village safe! The answer is that our people must learn to be better swimmers - and oh by the way, you said ‘stilts’ when the proper term is ‘piles,’ so why should anybody listen to you?” Have Smartphones Destroyed a Generation? More comfortable online than out partying, post-Millennials are safer, physically, than adolescents have ever been. But they’re on the brink of a mental-health crisis.

O ne day last summer, around noon, I called Athena, a 13-year-old who lives in Houston, Texas. On The Value Of The Process? She answered her phone—she’s had an rhetorical purpose, iPhone since she was 11—sounding as if she’d just woken up. Essay Value Of The Writing? We chatted about her favorite songs and TV shows, and I asked her what she likes to do with her friends. “We go to the mall,” she said. “Do your parents drop you off?,” I asked, recalling my own middle-school days, in the 1980s, when I’d enjoy a few parent-free hours shopping with my friends. “No—I go with my family,” she replied. “We’ll go with my mom and brothers and walk a little behind them. Rhetorical Purpose? I just have to tell my mom where we’re going. Essay On The Of The? I have to check in every hour or every 30 minutes.” Those mall trips are infrequent—about once a month.

More often, Athena and her friends spend time together on their phones, unchaperoned. Unlike the teens of my generation, who might have spent an rhetorical, evening tying up the geodesy family landline with gossip, they talk on Snapchat, the smartphone app that allows users to send pictures and videos that quickly disappear. They make sure to keep up their Snapstreaks, which show how many days in a row they have Snapchatted with each other. Rhetorical? Sometimes they save screenshots of essays, particularly ridiculous pictures of friends. Purpose Of Antithesis? “It’s good blackmail,” Athena said. (Because she’s a minor, I’m not using her real name.) She told me she’d spent most of the summer hanging out alone in her room with her phone. That’s just the way her generation is, she said. “We didn’t have a choice to know any life without iPads or iPhones. I think we like our phones more than we like actual people.” What Harvey Weinstein's Apology Reveals. On Thursday, The New York Times published an article reporting “decades of sexual harassment accusations” against the mogul.

Weinstein responded—with a statement that perfectly captures this chaotic moment in American culture. The apologies, taken together, read like poetry—or, perhaps, an construction, excruciatingly bad game of Mad Libs. This was a wake-up call. Rhetorical Purpose Of Antithesis? I’m so sorry. It’s not okay. I have more work to do. I’ll do better. Please help me do better. I’m sorry. I’m very sorry. I’m so very sorry.

I really do respect women. The latest person to add his own verses to this collective document of the way we live now—the latest man to apologize for sexual misconduct revealed and regretted—is Harvey Weinstein. Essay On The Value Writing? Hollywood’s extremely powerful king (and queen)maker, The New York Times reported on Thursday, has been repeatedly accused of sexual harassment and unwanted physical contact by women who have worked with him at both Miramax and the Weinstein Company. “An investigation by The New York Times ,” Jodi Kantor and of antithesis, Megan Twohey write, “found previously undisclosed allegations against Mr. Weinstein stretching over nearly three decades, documented through interviews with current and former employees and in the, film industry workers, as well as legal records, emails, and internal documents from the businesses he has run.” What If Everyone Ate Beans Instead of Beef? What can an individual do about climate change? The easiest answer: make this one dietary switch.

Depression, anxiety, overeating, addiction, and all other mental disorders share a common mechanism. Mass Shootings in purpose, the United States: 'This Is Who We Are' In the wake of Las Vegas, only one thing is certain, according to James Fallows: it will happen again. Get 10 issues a year and phd thesis, save 65% off the cover price.

Buy Essay Online -
Antithesis - Examples and Definition of …

analis essay How to rhetorical develop and phd thesis write an analytic essay. Argument : Writing an analytic essay requires that you make some sort of rhetorical of antithesis argument. The core of this argument is statement with in this, called a thesis. It is your claim, succinctly stated in a single sentence. What do budding literary critics such as yourselves argue about?

You make a pervasive, persistent case that a certain thing is true about a piece of rhetorical of antithesis literature. This thing should not be readily obvious to the casual reader of the literature in question. It is what you draw out of the book or essay, how you interpret it. It is a claim that must be supported by specific evidence from the text. Thesis statement: At least once during the in the us course of writing your essay, isolate what you consider to be your thesis. Is your proposition both arguable and reasonable?

If it is obvious (i.e. Mary Rowlandson used the purpose of antithesis Bible for comfort during her captivity) you don’t have an argument. Argument requires analysis (i.e. taking things apart and explaining them). One test that may help is asking yourself what the opposite construction test side of your argument would be. A good, complicated thesis (which was proposed by one of your classmates) is rhetorical of antithesis, that Although Mary Rowlandson says she often used the Bible as a source of comfort during her captivity, a closer reading of her narrative suggests her faith may have been more troubled by her experience than she lets on. One useful structure for writing thesis statements is the although form used above: Although x seems to be true about this piece of observation essays literature, y is in fact more true (or makes our thinking about x more complex). In this form you present both sides of of antithesis your argument at once and show which side you’re on. Your job in the paper is to convince your reader to join you. Another way to Dostoyevski write an rhetorical purpose of antithesis, effective thesis statement is to use the form If we look closely at x (e.g. how Bradford defines freedom) we discover y (that ). In order to find something to Dostoyevski argue: Look for images or metaphors that the author uses consistently. What other sort of of antithesis pattern can you identify in the text? How do you interpret this pattern so that your reader will understand the book, essay, poem, speech, etc. better?

What philosophical, moral, ethical, etc. ideas is the thesis statement in this essay author advocating or opposing? What are the consequences of accepting the author's argument? Explain how the rhetorical of antithesis work functions as a piece of rhetoric-- how does the author attempt to convince his or her reader of something? For instance, what widely held beliefs do they use to support their argument? How do they appeal to emotions, logic… Re-examine something that the text or most readers take for granted (that Thoreau’s book Walden represents his attempt to on the value of the writing escape from society). Purpose Of Antithesis! Question this major premise and geodesy see where it takes you.

Ask yourself if an purpose of antithesis, author’s literary argument is inconsistent with itself or is in some way philosophically dangerous, inadequate, unethical, or misleading. Examine how characters are presented in a story. How do they help the main character to develop? Which characters are trustworthy? Which are not? Why are they presented this way? What counts as evidence: Structure : How the parts of the book or essay follow one another; how the parts are assembled to make a whole? Why does the author start where they start, end where they end?

What is the logical progression of thought? How might that progression be intended to affect the reader What effect might this progression of ideas have on a generic reader or on a reader from the time period in which the work was written? Does the piece move from the general to the specific or vice versa? If you could divide the book/essay into sections, units of meaning, what would those sections be? How are they related to observation essays preschoolers each other? Note that chapters, while they form obvious sections can themselves be grouped. Referring to the text : In writing analytic papers that address any kind of literature, it is necessary to refer to the text (the specific words on the page of the book) in order to support your argument. Purpose! This means that you must quote and interpret passages that demonstrate or support your argument. Quotation is usually stronger than paraphrase.

Remember also that your purpose in in the us writing an essay is not merely to paraphrase or summarize (repeat) what the author has said, but to make an of antithesis, argument about how the make their point, or how they have said what they have said. Language : includes the way an author phrases his or her sentences, the key metaphors used (it’s up to you to explain how these metaphors are used, why these metaphors are appropriate, effective, ineffective, or ambiguous). Is the way a sentence is phrased particularly revealing of the a good begins with essay i will author’s meaning? Practical Essay-writing Hints: Please title your paper and make the title apt and enticing--I LOVE a good title. It puts me in a good mood before I start reading. Be clear about whether you’re writing about a book, an essay (non-fiction, short prose), a story (short fiction) a poem, a novel (book-length fiction), an rhetorical purpose, autobiography, a narrative (as in test Captivity Narratives) etc. Walden is a book comprised of chapters. Each of these chapters could also be called an essay. Within these essays, Thoreau sometimes tells stories. The book itself is not a story, but closer to a narrative, which is non-fiction.

Always go through at least two drafts of rhetorical you paper . Let your paper sit, preferably for 24 hours between drafts sometime during the process of your writing. Eliminate first person pronoun (I) in your final draft (it’s OK for rough drafts and may help you write). If your paragraphs are more a full page or more in length it is more than likely that they are tooooooo long . Essays In The Us! Probably you have too many ideas in the air at once. Rhetorical! Consider breaking the paragraph in half--into two smaller, but related arguments. Your reader needs a break, needs more structure in order to observation essays preschoolers be able to follow your meaning. If several of your paragraphs are exceedingly short (4-5 lines), it is rhetorical purpose, likely that you are not developing your ideas thoroughly enough--that you are writing notes rather than analysis. Short paragraphs are usually used as transitional paragraphs, not as content paragraphs. (Short paragraphs can be used in the rhetorical devise of Dostoyevski reversal where you lead your reader down a certain path (to show them one side of the argument, the one you are going to oppose) and then turn away from that argument to state the true argument of rhetorical of antithesis your paper.) Employ quotation often. One quotation per argumentative paragraph is construction essay, usually necessary.

Depending upon the length and complexity of the passage or topic you're dealing with, more quotations may be useful to prevent you from getting too far away from the rhetorical purpose text. Your quotations combined with your interpretations are your proof. Be sure that you show your reader how they should interpret these quotations in order to follow your argument. (Almost every quotation should be followed by us an interpretation, a deeper reading of what is being said and how its being said. This interpretation demonstrates how the quotation supports the claim you're making about it). Pay attention to metaphor, phrasing, tone, alliteration, etc. How is the rhetorical purpose author saying what they are saying--what does that teach us about the text? Remember to write directive (sometimes called topic) sentences for your paragraphs . The first sentence of any paragraph should give your reader an idea of observation essays what the purpose of antithesis paragraph is going to say and Dostoyevski how the rhetorical purpose of antithesis paragraph will connect to the larger argument. It should have more to do with what you have to construction essay test say about the materials than what the author him or herself has said.

Transitions between paragraphs : try to get away from rhetorical, using The next, First of all Another thing. to connect your paragraphs. This is the observation preschoolers list method of structuring a paper--not an integrated, logical approach. A really strong transition makes the logical connection between paragraphs or sections of a paper and rhetorical gives the thesis statement with i will reader a sense that you’re building an argument. To make sure you are making a well-connected argument, ask yourself how the last sentence of each paragraph and the first sentence of the rhetorical purpose next are connected. Each of the sentences within your paragraphs should be related somehow (follow from, refer to, etc.) the one that precedes it, and the one which follows it. This will help the statement begins with essay reader follow the flow of your ideas.

The order of your paragraphs should reveal a developing argument. On the purpose of antithesis most basic level, you should be able to consciously justify the presence and thesis with in this i will placement of purpose every word in every sentence, every sentence in every paragraph, every paragraph in every essay . To repeat: in revising your papers after the essays preschoolers first draft (which is always, inevitably to some degree confused because you are involved in rhetorical purpose the process of working your ideas out), you should be highly conscious of what you are doing and a good thesis with why you are doing it.

Write my essay for me with Professional Academic Writers -
Purpose Of Antithesis - …

Cars Should Be Banned From City Centres. In this debate, we focus on facilitating the efficiency of commerce in city centre, mostly Central Business District, and on reducing the urban pollution from its root, by purpose of antithesis, not harming the basic necessity of the people, who are working and living in the city centre, about essay on the writing transportation. Please cast your vote after you've read the arguments. You can also add to rhetorical purpose of antithesis the debate by Dostoyevski, leaving a comment at the end of the purpose of antithesis page. On avoiding the inefficiency of commerce as the basic function of City Centre.

Before we proposition start our debate, we find it necessary to clear up some definition of words. Firstly, we only discuss private vehicle here. Secondly, the City Centre we are to discuss means Central Business District, CBD. We believe that cars greatly damage the efficiency of commerce which is the basic function of CBD, because it creates traffic jams. We ban cars to force people use great public transportation provided there and to reinsure the efficiency of commerce. The use of cars is the reason why traffic jams happen everyday in CBD. Those who works there mostly car afford to live there, so cars is unnecessary for them. For those who are not living in there, they can go there with buses and metros, because once authority set up a CBD, they already provide CBD most lines of buses and geodesy metros. However, people rather use cars since they believe that using a car is a symbol of wealth, even if it's unnecessary like we proved. And the widespread of this psychology bring more and more cars in the street, so traffic jam occurs. Traffic jam harms the rhetorical basic function of CBD, which is to facilitate the efficiency of commerce.

The nature of essay on the CBD is an area where people could have business more conveniently as all the big companies and financial organs can be found there. So they can enjoy efficiency of trading, which businessman can gain profits with lower cost of time. However, when there are traffic jams, people take more times on the road rather than in the company. The efficiency of trade is greatly harmed. That's why we need to ban cars to reinsure that CBD can be functional.

Our action against traffic jam is justified since the function of rhetorical purpose CBD is of the benefits of the city as a whole. With I Will! In this case, people cannot fulfill full liberty to use their property because the city is purpose of antithesis providing them with great facilities to gain profits, so they shall maintain CBD to function. That's the justification of our action. With a clear justification, we are proud to propose. Propositon advocates for commerce, yet they want to affect a major mean of transportation, how is that logical? We will prove it is counter-productive. The main objective for the PROP side is geodesy phd thesis just to rhetorical of antithesis avoid traffic jams, with the reason for that being that, somehow (we still didn't understand the logic behind that how, though), the fact that people lose time while in geodesy, traffic makes them inefficient.

Even if that was logical, the truth is purpose that people that work in those commercial and financial districts obviously take the fact that there is certain traffic into consideration when working in those centers however the important fact is that in order to continue to be employed they have to work all of geodesy phd thesis their hours and purpose do their job effectively, otherwise they would be fired from the Dostoyevski company, for as simplistic this is, it is logical and real unlike an assumption of purpose of antithesis inefficiency. Secondly, the fact that there is traffic in those centers actually doesn't affect commerce or transportation significantly because the objective of those CBDs are built that way is so that major financial institutions and a good with in this essay i will corporations are all close together to facilitate commerce and so in that way it takes minutes to purpose of antithesis go from any place of that CBD to another one walking or even by car with traffic. For example, Frankfurt's Innenstadt is just .6 square miles while the phd thesis World's largest CBD (in New York) is rhetorical 7.82 and Chicago's is the only other CBD in USA that passes the 3 square miles[[]]. What does that mean? That traffic is not a real obstacle at CBDs. Prop says that they believe on not giving people full liberty to use their property in order to maintain a CBD functioning yet as we have said, its function is not affected at all and we will explain in Dostoyevski, one of our arguments below how it is wrong to deny someone to use their well-earned car as a means of rhetorical purpose of antithesis transport. We will also talk about how we don't oppose public transportation however cars are needed in this system.

Car uses at CBD is a quintessential example of rational irrationality that takes a toll on writing the entire society. Using cars at CBD demonstrates the rational irrationality that ultimately undermines the interests of every rational individual. Driving cars could be fast, and therefore I should drive a car. This is the rationale for an individual. And it surely makes sense. But when millions of people in town all think the same and consequently acting the same, we get problems. Cars are everywhere, making driving a short distance take a long long time: people get stuck in cars, wasting fuels, polluting the environment (for just for waiting!). No body can travel around at all. Yes, we love to realize people's full liberty's to drive cars and listen to car radios, but that liberty comes with a cost, a cost too big for the society to function, a cost that severely undermines everybody's liberty in this regard.

Because when people adheres perfect rationally to their preference, sometime they also act without regard to the irrationality of the rhetorical purpose decisions cost-benefit analysis in the bigger picture. And the total traffic turmoil is the bigger picture that people forget to phd thesis take into account. Rhetorical Purpose Of Antithesis! As a result, no one wins. No one get to effectively move at construction test all. Sometimes we need to limit some freedom in order to people to rhetorical purpose of antithesis enjoy more freedom in the same way we ban hate speech, we ban racially discriminatory contents. In order for every one to be able to MOVE in CBD, we ban cars here. PROP has taken a line of upholding certain liberties in order to avoid certain harm, in this case traffic. We say that apparent harm is essay on the of the writing process not really a harm but something natural of the cities but that even if it was a harm, it is not enough to withhold a liberty, and even if it was, in practical terms they will do more harm by creating a heart attack on a city whose main artery will be blocked. First it was claimed that the reason why people use cars to show wealth, and after our rebuttal now it is that people may think it is quicker but it's not. Well, in rhetorical purpose of antithesis, reality we cannot know what are the essay on the of the writing process routes or thoughts of the people but we cannot generalize for either way, because sometimes the distances can be covered quicker by using a car (specially through roads that aren't as packed or at certain hours where there is less traffic) and those people will be affected with such a bad policy like this one.

Yet, in the cases where actually public transportation could be quicker than car (because of the places where they live, routes they should take or whatever), we don't believe the reason for people using cars is of antithesis not stupidity but it may be for more factors such as comfort or security and for that they are willing to maybe take an extra hour at essay value of the writing process the traffic creating a traffic that affects someone else that also has the choice of public transportation but still prefers their cars (for whatever reason) and so, it is just plain bad to try to reduce an apparent harm that the people are actually willing to take and prefer to have! If they didn't they could use public transportation (as PROP has assumed it is rhetorical purpose quicker)! The other problem that PROP addresses is pollution but then that can be said about almost everything we do (eating meat and using computers are terrible for essay on the value process, global warming, for rhetorical purpose of antithesis, example) yet the solution is not prohibiting everything but try to geodesy mitigate the damage, such as the policies of some cars not circulating certain days or using alternative energy sources. The policy will help the transformation of CBD. The ideal CBD is a place that makes people enjoy the rhetorical purpose combination of work and life, therefore making the atmosphere more conducive for increasing productivity and employee satisfaction. Yet the status quo is quite the opposite: people are trapped in their cars--agitated by the non-moving traffic; blocked by the window to actually strike a nice conversation like passengers do in the public transportation system; in the mean time your car is geodesy phd thesis pumping into air toxic gases and wastes simply for the waiting. It creates a hostile environment from the start of the day! It reinforces the already thin humanly communication that a healthy employee needs; It turns all of us into the robot-like lives that reside in machines. Sufficient scientific data has shown the lack of rhetorical purpose communication is more likely to writing process lead to rhetorical purpose of antithesis mental illness. The cold facade of CBD may not start from using cars, but it needs to be broken, starting from banning cars. By banning cars at CBD, we are not only of the writing, providing people to have more access to talk to each other (which is more likely to happen in purpose, the proposed scenario than, say a iron-clad isolated vehicle), we are contributing to the human interaction, the self-actualization, and on immigration in the us the satisfaction that eventually comes with socializing in people: we can be heartened by rhetorical of antithesis, a conversation with a stranger on the bus; or we can breath the a good statement begins crispy air and purpose of antithesis finally feel alive.

All of these can barely happen if we are trapped in phd thesis, a over-air-coned car and complaining about the traffic! In the purpose of antithesis mean time, by having the ban, we become more environmental frjendly by both saving the energy and cutting cost. Last but not the least, less cars, and less demand for essay, funding roads. Then there will be more money for improving public utilities. By removing cars from the CBD streets, we create opportunities for rhetorical purpose, people to interact; we save more spaces for public utility; and we save the phd thesis environment; And we get a more habitable CBD.

Really? Meeting people is the rhetorical purpose problem? Prop is basing this argument in 2 assumptions: 1st, that all people are extremely socially active as to have the necessity of talking to construction test strangers in the streets. 2nd, that workers do not interact with others at all. Into the first one: A clarification of prop’s priorities is needed, if they pretend to defend efficiency then why should workers be meeting new friends in the streets of Polanco instead of rhetorical of antithesis heading straight to work (remember that now they take longer, as they have to travel by public transport), I thought that was what Fridays and parties were for. Essays On Immigration In The Us! The other thing is that fortunately most of them have it clear that they’ve got a responsibility with their jobs and thanks to this and to the typical behavior of people they don’t tend to be searching conversations anywhere, it could also be dangerous. Second assumption. Actually CBD workers do not have their job stations at rhetorical purpose bunkers, they have colleagues and partners to value of the writing whom they can talk to and relax during lunch or other moments. Also companies are conscious about the rhythm of purpose life in cities and this is why they implement activities like picnics and balls for they employees, meaning that they don’t really have a necessity nor an essay incentive for increasing their friends in Facebook. If Prop is rhetorical purpose so worried about the traffic, then the real transformation should involve something that deals with this problem without affecting others.

And as evidence supports public transportation is losing devotes [[]], the real change comes along with the improvement of the existing vehicle infrastructure, taking the a good begins with in this essay i will best out of rhetorical purpose what we have. Ideas like the development of superstreets by value of the writing process, the NCSU [[]] may prove to be the answer to what this debate is looking for. Obviously, the first step towards transformation is purpose of antithesis opposing to this motio. The World's most important Chief Executive Officers pushing their ways in the subway! People should not be denied to use the means of transportation that they want, and less if it is one of their property, such as a well-earned car, or at least not for the reasons provided by essay value of the process, the proposition. PROP mentioned that the reason why people use cars is rhetorical purpose of antithesis just to observation essays preschoolers show their wealth.

We don't just say that is false (for example, in Caracas almost every car has blackened windows so the other people cannot see who is in the car) but we also say that there are many powerful reasons why anyone, and specially those that work in CBDs, would decide to use their cars as best option for of antithesis, transportation (yet again, not opposing public transportation). A good reason for that is security. Dostoyevski! Someone like a CEO of a big transnational or the director of a financial institution becomes a vulnerable target when going on public transportation. It is just an absurd idea to of antithesis think that those men (who may well be some of the most powerful men in the World) would decide to go in an overcrowded metro or bus instead of going with their cars, which are probably surrounded by other 4 with bodyguards. Value Of The! We believe these people need to go to their work in private cars because in any other case they would be an easy target for kidnappings or heavy assaults. If that's not the case then picture them with ten bodyguards around pushing everyone to get into the metro wagon, which right now is rhetorical purpose already overcrowded in any city you can tell me, and now adding in basically almost everyone that works in CBDs.

Yeah, picture the CEO of the biggest transnational you can think about getting into the bus. Now imagine the reporters and general people stalking them. OPP can't. People have that right over their own cars and they should use them if they want to avoid pushing and being targets for essays, robberies and go comfortable in their cars as well. Whoever doesn't want to have traffic should use public transportation, however if you are willing to purpose wake up an essays on immigration in the hour earlier but listening your car's music, go for rhetorical, it. The Opp's entire case is based on on the of the writing one assumption: the traffic at CBD is rhetorical purpose fine, and therefore no need to change. However, they miss the central point of Dostoyevski this debate which is CBDs are indeed crammed as hell. Rhetorical Purpose! Otherwise we won't be having this at all. Geodesy Phd Thesis! If they are truly as logical as they claimed, they should at least tell us how the all jammed-up CBD where everyone can't effectively transport is better than our proposed transportation which asks everyone especially the sedentary ones to move their chubby buttocks. Opp talks about efficiency and how cars are efficient.

Yes, cars are pretty efficient, but not at purpose CBD! What a real picture is preschoolers hundreds of of antithesis thousands of geodesy phd thesis cars all swarm in the business center roads, car honking, people complaining yet no one is actually moving! There is a joke about the CBD of Beijing: with the majority of rhetorical 750'000 registered cars pouring in, the CBD roads are now called the giant car parking lot. How is that efficient? How does businesses' profit not hurt when you virtually spend the better part of your day stuck in your car; when the geodesy mail delivery vehicles get jammed and consequently delay delivery? When it actually takes longer time to drive than to walk?

And it is not just in Beijing, in Mexican city too, with more than 3 million registered vehicles, Mexico City is difficult to navigate. Major roads are nearly always congested..And the CBD which the Opp recognizes as the Axis of Transportation is purpose of antithesis going to take the test hardest blow since all cars go to rhetorical of antithesis CBD, and traffic jam there will amount to Dostoyevski the degree of unbearable. Increased traffic as a result of the prohibition of cars. One of the rhetorical predominant characteristics among CBDs is their privileged geographical location within the cities in which they are located. It is a general norm that this prominent zones must be accessible for the entire city and that they need to be greatly connected in Dostoyevski, terms of its proximity with transportation centrals and governmental institutions. This is the reason why much of the urban growth has its epicenter in Financial Districts, meaning that at the they will be the axis of the city or at least one of most transited areas of it (that’s why they are built for, isn’t it?); it is the case of Polanco in Mexico, Innenstadt in Germany, the purpose of antithesis Yuzhong District in China and of many other CBDs in construction essay test, the world being connected with important avenues and rhetorical of antithesis districts. Because of this particular feature banning the Dostoyevski presence of purpose of antithesis cars does not only directly impact City Centres, people who would usually transit through this channels while heading to their destinations in the terminus of the city or that were simply encouraged to cross this areas would find their most convenient route closed. As if digging an enormous hole in the middle of the city, people would now need to muddle through the Dostoyevski peripheries of the rhetorical city in order to get to where they need. It would also result into fewer highways and the concomitant traffic jams generated. In the on the value writing end this won’t only impact the purpose schedules of Dostoyevski all of the rhetorical purpose of antithesis citizens, but it would also be reflected in the economy as the routes of the cities’ industrial transportation become slower and companies invest more time in moving their products.

Contrary to what the proposition established, there is essays no economic incentive here and a greater affection for the lesser good. The Opp also tells us that because many CBDs are small and they provide us with many statistics, therefore cars don't hurt the rhetorical purpose traffic. Again, their evidence just further undercut their case. If CBD is generally quite small, with millions of cars wouldn't it be crammed to the point of explosion (like it is now!) and that helps facilitate traffic? The answer is NO. More importantly If they are small, then businesses are just within walking distance, several subway or bus stops away, would that be easier for people to run between meeting than get stuck in essay of the process, the car. Also on of antithesis security issues, taking a subway or bus makes you more likely to face security issues such as robbery, and theft.

In order to make this point at least stand, the Opp should tell us how driving a car makes you less likely to be robbed and stole from. And the evidence can point to the other direction: you can have your car stolen while you are at work; you can have the geodesy robber hiding in your car and attack you or just smashing your window which is more likely to make you hurt. And in of antithesis, the subway or bus, at least you can get help from essay of the writing, other passengers! On personal safety of the purpose privileged people, the Opp's argument goes, they are likely to be stalked on public transport system. Well please heed the definition, if these people are privileged to hire body guards, then the vehicle they are using is not a private car because there are organizations who have vested interested in essays on immigration, sending their car for the privileged ones to use in order to of antithesis make them better protected. A second problem derived from the thesis with essay i will policy concerns the labor force of the CBDs. While it is true that a “car free zone” may actually help to purpose reduce traffic within the area, it wouldn't ease the transportation requirements of its population. As noted by the affirmative team residents of CBDs could take advantage of this policy, but Business Districts are not intended to serve as residential zones. In his book Commercial Structure and Commercial Blight, Brian Berry explains why land value is higher in CBDs than in any other place[1] , and given the high cost of the geodesy land the population of this areas is reduced and living there is affordable exclusively for executives and top directors.

But we most keep an purpose eye in Dostoyevski, the rest of the labor force of the big companies, the majority, as all of these other employees come from rhetorical, other zones in the cities or even from different cities just for the labor journey. Forcing all of these persons to travel by public transportation from their far away residences to the Financial Districts would take a really efficient system -fast, cheap, secure, clean, and always accessible- for making the measure successful. Truth is that there are not too many countries that can claim to in the have one of those. In the everyday experiences people face with crowded buses, dirty installations and a lot of irregularities that make it much more easier for them to travel by car, this with the normal amount of passengers, now if we add all of the people that are going to change their means of transportation then those anemic systems would collapse. In order for the policy to succeed then we need to restructure not only the CBDs transport, but the rhetorical purpose whole city’s transportation system!

It is of course a titanic effort that takes lots of investment and resources which would make the situation difficult to come true, the initiative would just turn into a daily headache for geodesy phd thesis, workers. Sedentary! The Opp talks about sedentary: business people who are sedentary need to move fast. Two responses: First, they can move faster by rhetorical, public transportation; Second. isn't it that being sedentary gives them all the more reason to move their chubby buttocks? More often than not, people take cars just because they are too LAZY to use their foot. On The Value Of The Writing! And more importantly, this creeping mentality that all the privileged people get to purpose of antithesis use cars make the CBD snobs all the more willing to value of the cram up in the cars, the millions of which are destroying the functioning transportation in the CBD! But at some point we have the courtesy to concede, public transportation is not perfect. It asks you to walk a few steps; sometimes it gets too crowded, too stingy, too noisy.

But that is not public transportation is inherently about. It is not that all pleasant at rhetorical the present is that it is so underfunded! In the on immigration in the us case of D.C. Of Antithesis! metro system, About $50 billion in essays on immigration in the us, backlog repairs is needed for of antithesis, rail transit systems, but just $5.6 billion was spent in 2006. The governments are so obsessive with building more roads to accommodate cars (which doesn't quite solve the us problem because it extends to size of the city, making people travel more distance and takes away the public space which otherwise could be a park to rhetorical purpose of antithesis rest in, a museum to immerse in; or a library to contemplate in), thereby making the funding available for public system barely meet the needs. If we ban cars in the CBD, the funding need for more roads will be reduced, and more money will be available for a comfortable and essay test spacious subway and bus system. What commerce in CBDs is of antithesis really like. In times of a massively interconnected economy, with sales rising or falling for unimaginable events in distant parts of the world, the importance of this districts relays not in heavy industrial processes but in the service sector. The similarity among the a good statement begins with in this i will firms located in CBDs reside in that almost all of the establishments there are dedicated to administrative and financial labors, not mattering if the rhetorical purpose enterprise sells cars or if it is an essays on immigration in the us important telecommunication firm. We will find executives, managing directors, officers and employees which jobs are far from being the sedentary tasks of staying in rhetorical purpose of antithesis, an office 8 hours a day. Geodesy Phd Thesis! No, this class of workers requires jumping from meeting to meeting, they may need to travel themselves to supervise the correct fulfillment of a project in one of the enterprise’s facilities, or they’ll need to take care from an international client who has come to purpose close a deal.

Given the conditions of begins in this their jobs they may also require to carry themselves valuable and rhetorical purpose ostentatious objects as cell phones or laptops, a change of clothes, documents and things which are difficult to be controlled by just two hands in one same moment. Viewed from essay on the process, any of the perspectives it is clear that having a car is not a luxury for them, it is a requirement for their jobs and it is the reason why many companies take the initiative to purpose of antithesis provide their employees with a vehicle so that they can always be in time for their appointments, with the necessary equipment and without incidents. As simple as it sounds. Substituting their transportation means may mean a decrease in efficiency, because no matter how good a public transport is, it will always take more time than traveling by your own in your car. Even if the delay is minimum, let’s say 20 minutes more than a car journey per trip, a person who needs to attend to 4 different meetings in a single day will require more than an hour more than if he had travelled by car. Quite an elevated price to pay. Status Quo is Dostoyevski way better for the problem they try to rhetorical purpose of antithesis solve. If you block an artery of a human body the consequence of it will be a heart attack. Same applies with the main roads of a city, and that is what the Proposition tries to implement. As we have already said, through the CBDs transit many cars, not only those of the people that work there, but also people that live around and want to go to any other place, or people that cross the city.

Actually there is more people that transit those streets than those that actually go to CBDs that, as we have raised, are small. Dostoyevski! And yes, we stand on our point that the traffic is not bad within CBDs because people don't take cars to travel 200 meters (the majority of the World's CBDs are less than a kilometer long). Does the proposition really think that people use cars when they can just arrive in one or two minutes walking? That's not the case, the traffic is caused by everyone that transits around the rhetorical city and needs to go through the center (from east to west, north to south. Essays Us! ). Now picture all the people that want to move within the city blocked! The only rhetorical, result will be total chaos of a city! The people will need to look for alternative routes (that will be even more jam packed, since they are not built to receive traffic, unlike those that pass in CBDs) and geodesy phd thesis if there are none, then the government will need to build other roads (which is almost impossible) just to avoid those 600 meters that are the rhetorical main artery of the city. Observation Essays! It will just be a ridiculous policy.

Now, on purpose the point of security, we don't say cars are perfectly safe (so of course the Proposition can raise hundredths of hypothetical crimes committed against car drivers) however in public transportation you are exposed and vulnerable, unlike cars, where you can go unnoticed and less of a target (specially in with in this essay i will, those traffic roads without traffic lights), and in cases of high profile people, they may need bodyguard cars that ARE NOT public as the rhetorical purpose of antithesis Proposition tries to say, since those services are not provided by the state. We say banning private cars in CBD instead of letting those cars stuck in the traffic jams is essays on immigration in the really important. Because it severely damage the rhetorical purpose efficiency of CBD, for example CBD of Beijing. Besides the choice of Dostoyevski public transportation, you can walk if the purpose of antithesis distance is not too far, and this how financial elites working in Wall Street do. On Immigration Us! Also, it is not difficult to see city mayer go to his office by public transportation. The concern of being a target of terrorist in this case is far less harmful than living in rhetorical of antithesis, a fixed habitation and working in a fixed location. It is much easier to know someones living place or working place, which makes them so easy to be targeted. Having a car is not a luxury. Observation! So that’s why so many people can buy it.

However, overuse of cars in purpose of antithesis, CBD have CBD fail to function or function less. The traffic jams caused by heavy traffic burdens requires a solution. OPP should not just talk about the benefit of owning a car without facing the situation we have. The solution of removing heavy traffic burdens is not about essays on immigration in the us broad avenues or more highways, as we witness a lot of cities in China with super broad and super complicated transportation systems still cannot find a way to ease the burden of rhetorical purpose of antithesis overuse of private cars, especially in the CBD areas where most of the cars are heading in or out. An example from CBD of Seoul, Korea, a high way constructed in the super busy CBD, removed and replaced by an artificial river. Consequently, the former traffic burden in that region has been removed and essays on immigration in the us make the place nicer and much more efficient in transportation. But problem here today is the over rhetorical of antithesis, use of cars in CBD region, which makes the region not as efficient as it is expected. Then we need to change, to essays perfect it with banning private cars used here. Otherwise, situation will just become worse and as a CBD can no longer act as a CBD.

Finally companies will look for other suitable places to move to and such an inefficient CBD would be abandoned. Why banning cars isn’t a smart decision. I dare you dear proposition to take a look into purpose, one of the streets of Raffles Place or of any other ironical CBD around the Dostoyevski world. Rhetorical Purpose! Places conceived for maximizing efficiency. How? By using cars! That is the reason why you’ll find yourselves surrounded by traffic lights, parking lots, big avenues and gas stations that were all built for supporting the smart and statement begins essay i will efficient drivers. By the way, all of these marvelous installments weren’t magically created. Governments had to make use of taxes to give maintenance to streets.

Entrepreneurs spent millions in of antithesis, building the parking slots in all of the skyscrapers. And most importantly, normal people like you and me bought cars in order to take advantage of this scenario! Because doing it would lead them to easier and more comfortable lives. The prohibition of cars will take away the soul-purpose of the investments of all of Dostoyevski these groups. It’ll turn what was once a very rentable active into rhetorical purpose, an obsolete and Dostoyevski depressing passive. Appealing to the recycling of this resources, like the transformation of big avenues into quicker effective transportation and better investment is false and wrong. Government may have the resources for rhetorical of antithesis, doing it but it doesn’t justify the construction frittering of billions of dollars that those roads cost to all of the citizens [[]]. Do you really think that entrepreneurs will look happily while their inversions drop to 0 because of a negligence?

Like constructing the parking slots and gas stations, remodeling them for making them again usable costs money, and a lot of it. What about the civilians who will be forced to watch how their cars powder in their garages because they can only use them when they don’t have to work? That is certainly not what they bought them for, hours of effort going to waste. It is actually an rhetorical purpose of antithesis abuse! To protect the investments of the geodesy phd thesis many people who rely on the effectiveness of the usage of car, we beg you to oppose th. There are three key questions: 1,-Will this measure prevent traffic? This was the most discussed issue since Prop defined that as the problem they tried to solve and we have clearly made the point that it won't be the case. Prop started off the debate by saying that, obviously, traffic jams are caused by cars, however there was not major analysis on rhetorical purpose of antithesis that whilst we said that actually blocking the main artery of a city will give it a heart attack, since cars need to go through the centers in order to get to geodesy other places (or through) the rhetorical purpose of antithesis city and here they would need to go around, something answered, whilst we also said a better investment is to improve roads. 2.-Will it affect commerce? Yes because traffic isn't much of essays preschoolers a problem within the CBDs since, as we said, they're purposely built small so everything is close together and by purpose, walking distance so the essay on the of the process people actually walk there, however the nature of the people working there requires them to purpose of antithesis use their cars a lot (such as for supervising projects or transporting clients) since they are active and need to be moving from place to essays on immigration in the place carrying laptops, without necessarily the public transport system being able to carry them everywhere, so in the end their policy will be the one that affects commerce.

Prop's main reason on purpose commercial harm is that somehow for being in the traffic, people stop being efficient however Opp said that those workers take their cautions and are obliged to begins with in this work their hours, regardless of the rhetorical purpose of antithesis hours they lose outside work. We also said that with slower routes, the industries will suffer losses, as will the government and its road investments . Their point of meeting friends in the subway was just pointless; we said relationships are done at the office and parties. 3.-Should the right of using cars be denied? No, because Prop says that using cars is irrational, first by saying that people only use cars to show wealth and when we made our rebuttal saying that actually in some cities the majority of cars have darkened shields/windows they changed their minds saying that the reason was stupidity in the people thinking cars are quicker than the public transportation, and we said sometimes they are , and even in those cases where they aren't, the truth is that they prefer to Dostoyevski use their well-earned investment of car where they can be more comfortable even if they are willing to take more time, this is a matter of rhetorical purpose of antithesis being their own choice, which Prop tried to cut on the basis that people are irrational. Most people clearly prefer traffic than public transportation. Moreover there could be other reasons such as security, and Prop answered that cars can still be targets for crime, but we said that they could be a less vulnerable target. Then our point of high profile people fully stands on our side since Prop only essays in the, answered saying they could still use security companies since they are public, something that is obviously not true. Rhetorical Purpose! They do a direct harm here. Opp made its point clear.

What do you think? Continue the Debate - Leave a Comment. 2 Comments on Dostoyevski Cars Should Be Banned From City Centres why is there no talk about all the purpose lives saved from car accidents? We would love to hear what you think – please leave a comment!

High Quality Custom Essay Writing Service -
What is the purpose of an antithesis? | …

a. Distinguish between the Utilitarianism of Bentham and Mill. This essay was written by an AS candidate. Rhetorical Purpose! Grade boundaries for AS are (out of 35 marks) 80% + (28/35), 70% + (25/35), 60% + (21/35), grades A,B,C. It is a much better effort than the previous essay on utilitarianism on this site. Here we have part a. and part b., (part a. 25 marks, part b. 10 marks). Utilitarianism was developed in observation essays, the 18th century by Hutchenson, who used the phrase “the greatest good for the greatest number” to describe his theory. Purpose! The promotion of happiness, however, can be found much earlier in history, in the works of Aristotle, in the Bible, in the teachings of Buddha, in the works of Confucius and observation essays preschoolers, elsewhere. Hutchenson’s idea of Utilitarianism, however, seeks to find a rational means of purpose of antithesis, assessing how best to put this promotion of happiness into practice, and is split into two types; Act Utilitarianism is the earliest form, in which what is deemed right is based on the assessment of a good with in this i will, results of purpose, a particular action, and Rule Utilitarianism, which allows to be taken into account the general benefit to society that occurs when people follow general rules.

A good, clear introduction, giving precise definititions of observation essays, key terms (see the Glossary on the site!). There is also the rhetorical of antithesis preference utilitarianism of geodesy, Peter Singer. However, if you look back at the question, the first four lines aren’t really relevant, as the purpose question only asks you to discuss Bentham and Mill! Bentham and Mill each argued respectively for these types of Utilitarianism, and thus their beliefs differ.Bentham was born in Dostoyevski, London at a time of great scientific and social change. He argued for Act Utilitarianism, and maintained that human beings were motivated by pleasure and by of antithesis pain. He believed that everyone had an equal right to happiness, irrespective of their situation or status in life and thesis statement with essay i will, argued that everyone counted equally in the assessment of the benefits of an action.

He believed that overall, this would also benefit the individual who did so and this would lead to that person’s greatest happiness as well. His theory is democratic as pleasure cannot be for purpose of antithesis, one person and one person alone. You bring out Dostoyevski, two key points rather well: that utilitarianism is rationalistic (para 1) and that it is democratic (each to count as one, and no-one as more than one), thus providing the purpose basis for radical social reform. Bentham wrote down his beliefs in his major work, ‘The principles of morals and legislation’, written in1789, which is divided into three sections; The motivation of human beings and the concept of good and bad – “Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for statement begins with essay, them alone to rhetorical purpose of antithesis point out what we shall do, as well as to determine what we shall do.” ; The Principle of Utility -The greatest good for the greatest number (The most useful course of Dostoyevski, action if trying to maximise pleasure and minimize pain and in a given situation, one must examine the consequential pain/pleasure resultant for all concerned.) ; and lastly, his Hedonic Calculus – this weighs up the pain and pleasure generated by the available moral actions to rhetorical purpose of antithesis find the best option.

It asks us to consider ( s ) several factors: c. Certainty or uncertainty. d. Nearness or remoteness. I would prefer to see the hedonic calculus applied with an example which brings out some of the essays on immigration problems with this sort of idea. If the probable pain of an action outweighs its pleasure then Bentham says that it is morally wrong. He believed that this was the rhetorical purpose way of calculating happiness as a result of the essays course of an action and by this he was making the rhetorical of antithesis basis of deciding whether an action should be considered right or wrong.

Also implied in Bentham’s views, Mill argued that not all forms of happiness or pleasure were of equal value. This isn’t expressed very clearly: you mean, Bentham implied any pleasure is of equal value eg pushpin is equal to poetry, whereas Mill, who had a nervous breakdown at essay on the value process, the age of 23, was saved by reading Wordsworth eg Intimations of Immortality and rhetorical, so, from his superior vantage point, saw pleasures as higher and lower. He recognised that it was easy to settle for the more immediate and sensual pleasures rather than the nobler and perhaps more refined ones. Mill criticised Bentham for focussing morality on pleasure alone, which seemed rather base to him. Thus, he decided to introduce a theory of utility for the common person , which replaced pleasure with happiness and moved away from essays on immigration in the mere quantity to the quality of happiness as well. Although he believed that the wellbeing of the individual was of purpose of antithesis, primary concern, happiness is best achieved when it is subject to the rules that protect the common good. For Mill, happiness was defined as something which is phd thesis cultural and spiritual rather than just physical, and he distinguished between lower pleasures and higher pleasures. He famously wrote “It is better to rhetorical purpose of antithesis be a human being satisfied than a pig satisfied, better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.” Mill recognised that there were different ways of assessing the value of happiness and was keen to link his theory with Jesus’ teachings. Geodesy! He did this by claiming that to ‘Love your neighbour as yourself’ constitutes the ideal perfection of utilitarian morality. Mill, unlike Bentham, suggested a positive place for of antithesis, rules within an overall utilitarianist approach, and thus believed in Rule Utilitarianism.

He argued that society needs the basic principles such as truthfulness for without people telling the truth then nobody can be happy. Thus, he argued, general rules should be obeyed as they give overall benefit to society. However, they may be broken in exceptional circumstances and consequently Mill argued there was strong and geodesy, weak rule utilitarianism; Strong Utilitarianism is one where one should never break a rule that is established, and Weak Utilitarianism is one where there may be situations when the rhetorical purpose assessment of the rules in a particular case of a particular act may take precedence over the general rule. Why not quote Mill directly? It’s not too difficult to find a few quotes…and learn them. It increases the sense that you know what Mill actually said. This is good stuff, but not very clearly presented as the observation essays preschoolers ideas come thick and fast. If you’re reading these comments, I strongly advise you to read Mill for yourself, available here on the site. Go to the final section of his essay and read the part on Justice and Utility. I think it’s the best part of the Essay and presents the case for rule utilitarianism. An outstanding student will want to rhetorical purpose of antithesis read all philosophers in their own words.

Mill and Bentham each believe in in the, their own type of Utilitarianism and have their own theories. Bentham, on the one hand, focuses on rhetorical purpose of antithesis, pleasure whereas Mill focuses on happiness. Similarly, in Dostoyevski, the search to maximise happiness, Bentham is concerned for the individual alone, but Mill suggests we should protect a common good. Although both theories are atheistic, Bentham suggests a means for quantitive pleasure with his Hedonic Calculus, but Mill suggests qualitative views with higher or lower pleasures. I like the clear style of your writing, and you cover the purpose main points of the two versions very well. 21/25 for part a.

b. Explain the major weaknesses of geodesy phd thesis, Utilitarianism as a way of of antithesis, determining right and wrong. Utilitarianism may not necessarily result in happiness as happiness is a personal choice. Something that makes one person happy may not make another happy. T his isn’t very clear. Better to argue that happiness is a byproduct of essay value, doing or being something rather than a thing you can pursue in rhetorical of antithesis, its own right. In Utilitarianism it may be that the person who decides whether an act is right or wrong is biased in some way and thus this would result in unhappiness. The act of deciding the right- or wrongness of an Dostoyevski act is in itself an act and somebody must therefore decide if the decision to make an act right is right and thus a circular argument is created.

However, there are different weaknesses for Bentham and Mill’s separate theories. Bentham’s theory has problems when the number of offenders outnumbers the victim. For example, if there were a group of rapists planning to attack one woman, then according to Bentham’s Hedonic Calculus the rhetorical of antithesis offenders’ pleasure would outweigh the geodesy phd thesis woman’s pain and of antithesis, thus make the attack justifiable. As in Bernard Williams’ famous Jim and the Indians example, see handout on the site. This is known as the Swine Ethic. Also, it is not possible to know when consequences should stop being considered. Consequences are not really measurable as we do not know how far the consequences will reach or when we can stop taking them into account.

Also, in construction essay, Bentham’s theory there is rhetorical no protection for minority groups; as with the victim and offender example, if a whole community were fighting to banish a small group of gypsies from land It’s always excellent to produce your own examples, and the news is full of a good statement begins with, examples like this (or use clips from films and describe them briefly) that nobody owned and that the gypsies were actually looking after, then by the Hedonic Calculus, the gypsies should be made to go no matter how much they were actually making the ground better. Similarly, Mill’s theory has its own weaknesses. Three in fact a lot of people in history have criticised utilitarianism, the most recent philosopher who wrote extensively was Bernard Williams. An extract from his obituary is on purpose of antithesis, the site. people have publicly shown these weaknesses and the first was Sidgwick who suggested that “In practice it is hard to distinguish between higher and lower pleasures”. A Good Thesis With I Will! This brings to the front the subjectivity of “pleasure”, as what is pleasurable for one person is by no means necessarily pleasurable for another. Purpose! The second weakness was noted by WD Ross who argued that “Single-factor” moral theories don’t work because life is Dostoyevski too complex. He suggested that we have “prima facie” duties. For example, if a person had to choose who to save and the choice was their son or a man with the rhetorical of antithesis cure to AIDS, then the essays on immigration us answer would be the son because their prima facie duty is to rhetorical him. Furthermore, as RM Hare noted, you would still have to tell the truth to a mad axe man if a common rule of telling the truth was to be obeyed, and it would also still be possible to justify slavery as the rights of minority groups are still not protected. Bentham’s Utilitarianism is essay test a type of Act Utilitarianism. It is a teleological, relative and purpose of antithesis, consequential argument that uses the on immigration us outcomes of an action to assess whether it is right or wrong and thus there are no necessary moral rules except one; that we should always seek to purpose achieve the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people.

For this type of Utilitarianism, it is difficult to on the value of the writing process predict the consequences as there is a potential to justify any act, defining pleasure itself is subjective to the person who is asked, there is no defence for the minorities and it is impractical to suggest that we should calculate the rhetorical purpose of antithesis morality of each choice that every single person on the world ever makes. On the other hand, Mill’s Utilitarianism is often linked to Rule Utilitarianism, and the belief that rules should be formed using Utilitarian principles for the benefit of the whole society. This itself has weaknesses. For example, similar to Bentham, it is difficult to essay value writing process predict the consequences of every action that could occur. Also, there is a difficulty in defining what constitutes happiness as this would differ depending on who you asked. Once again, there is no defence for the minorities. Couldn’t you argue for a rule defending minority rights on grounds of general utility, because I can’t be sure I won’t be in rhetorical of antithesis, a minoriy on some issue some time?

Eg free speech, free association, rights to demonstrate could all be defended (as Mill himself would have done) on grounds of a good thesis i will, social utility. Although Mill and Kant are often placed at opposite ends of a deontological and teleological spectrum, it’s surprising how close rule utilitarianism comes to Kantian ethics, and Mill did in fact argue that “do to others as you would have them do to you” was the classic utilitarian rule. (Recall it is rhetorical purpose very close to the first formulation of the Categorical Imperative, universalisability…see my handout on Kant). In general, Utilitarianism is weak as it is difficult to predict consequences, as the theory disregards motivation and goodwill, as it suggests that the majority is always right which causes issues when the Nazis are the majority, and geodesy phd thesis, it does not protect the minorities. In general the single criterion for rhetorical of antithesis, morality is of the writing process far too simplistic to deal with the complexity of life. Not sure I like the rhetorical purpose of antithesis conclusion much! It’s a bit limp, and doesn’t explain the enduring appeal of utilitarianism to people as easy to understand and apply, and so creating a basis for much social legislation (think of the 1967 Abortion Act!). Nonetheless, this is good part b and essays, deserves 8/10, giving you overall 29/35, and an A grade. PMB November 2008. Have you got an rhetorical purpose of antithesis essay you’d like me to mark and post? It has to be A grade standard (so I can tell you how to reach perfection, but also so you have something to value compare with when you write your answers).

“I’m just so grateful without your site I would have crumbled this year” Wow! Thanks very much for this help. It is an excellent basis for my revision. We have found your website and the people we have contacted to be incredibly helpful and purpose of antithesis, it is very much appreciated.